The primary reason that makes resolving jurisdictional conflicts complicated is the lack of clear legal frameworks and conflicting international laws.

D.

With international operations, systems ultimately cross many jurisdictional boundaries, and many times, they conflict with each other.

The major hurdle to overcome for an organization is the lack of an ultimate international authority to mediate such conflicts, with a likely result of legal efforts in each jurisdiction.

The primary reason that makes resolving jurisdictional conflicts complicated is the lack of international authority. Jurisdictional conflicts arise when there is a dispute over which country's laws should apply in a particular case. This can occur when two or more countries have overlapping laws or when there are differences in legal standards between countries.

In order to resolve these conflicts, there needs to be a system in place that can determine which jurisdiction has the authority to adjudicate the case. However, the lack of a centralized international authority makes this process difficult.

Each country has its own legal system and its own laws, and there is no global standard for resolving jurisdictional conflicts. This means that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to these disputes, and it can be difficult to determine which laws should apply in a particular case.

Moreover, different countries may have different interpretations of international law or may not recognize the jurisdiction of other countries' courts. This can further complicate the process of resolving jurisdictional conflicts.

In conclusion, while factors such as different technology standards, costs, and language barriers can contribute to the complexity of resolving jurisdictional conflicts, the lack of international authority is the primary reason why this process is so complicated. Without a global standard for resolving these disputes, it can be difficult to determine which jurisdiction has the authority to adjudicate a particular case.