Re-evaluating IT Strategic Initiatives

C.

The question is asking which of the given options indicates that an established IT governance framework could handle the re-evaluation required for an enterprise's strategic change. Let's break down each option to determine the best answer:

A. Creation of an IT steering committee to align the IT strategic initiatives to the recent change This option suggests the creation of an IT steering committee to align IT strategic initiatives with the recent change. The establishment of an IT steering committee is a common practice in IT governance frameworks. The committee's role is to provide guidance, review, and approve IT strategies, initiatives, and investments to ensure alignment with the organization's objectives. Therefore, this option indicates that an established IT governance framework could handle the re-evaluation required for the enterprise's strategic change.

B. Inclusion of IT portfolio management procedures with strategic change review activities This option suggests the inclusion of IT portfolio management procedures with strategic change review activities. IT portfolio management is a key component of IT governance, and it involves managing IT investments and resources to achieve the organization's objectives. However, this option does not provide enough information on how IT portfolio management procedures would handle the re-evaluation required for the enterprise's strategic change. Therefore, this option is not the best answer.

C. Development of a business case to evaluate the impact of the strategic change This option suggests the development of a business case to evaluate the impact of the strategic change. Developing a business case is a good practice in IT governance, as it helps to evaluate the feasibility, costs, benefits, and risks of IT investments. However, this option does not provide enough information on how the development of a business case would handle the re-evaluation required for the enterprise's strategic change. Therefore, this option is not the best answer.

D. Holding IT investments until an analysis of the strategic change impact was complete. This option suggests holding IT investments until an analysis of the strategic change impact was complete. Holding IT investments is not a good practice in IT governance because it may lead to missed opportunities, delayed projects, and reduced competitiveness. Additionally, this option does not provide enough information on how holding IT investments would handle the re-evaluation required for the enterprise's strategic change. Therefore, this option is not the best answer.

In conclusion, option A is the best answer because it indicates the creation of an IT steering committee to align the IT strategic initiatives with the recent change, which is a common practice in IT governance frameworks.