Why Implement Local Security Regulations in Multinational Organizations?

D.

In a multinational organization, both global security policies and local security regulations should be implemented. However, the priority between these two might differ based on the context of the organization. Local security regulations should take precedence over global security policy because they are mandatory legal requirements that must be followed by the local business units.

Option D, "requirements of local regulations take precedence," is the correct answer.

Local regulations may vary from country to country and failure to comply with them may lead to legal issues or penalties. Therefore, it is necessary to implement local security regulations as a priority over global security policy. Global security policy can be designed to complement local regulations, but not replace them.

Option A, "deploying awareness of local regulations is more practical than of global policy," is not a valid reason to prioritize local security regulations over global security policy. While it may be true that it is easier to raise awareness about local regulations, the priority should be based on the legal requirement rather than practicality.

Option B, "global security policies include unnecessary controls for local businesses," is not a valid reason to prioritize local security regulations over global security policy. Global security policy is designed to ensure consistency and security across all business units, and it may include controls that are necessary for the organization as a whole.

Option C, "business objectives are defined by local business unit managers," is also not a valid reason to prioritize local security regulations over global security policy. While local business unit managers may have input into business objectives, they should be aligned with the overall goals and objectives of the organization, which are driven by the global security policy.