Choose the Appropriate Google Cloud Load Balancer for Secure Email Services
Question
Your company has recently expanded their EMEA-based operations into APAC.
Globally distributed users report that their SMTP and IMAP services are slow.
Your company requires end-to-end encryption, but you do not have access to the SSL certificates.
Which Google Cloud load balancer should you use?
Answers
Explanations
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.A.
https://cloud.google.com/security/encryption-in-transit/Based on the provided scenario, the company requires a load balancer that can handle slow SMTP and IMAP services and provide end-to-end encryption without having access to the SSL certificates. Let's go through each of the options and their capabilities to determine the most appropriate load balancer:
A. SSL proxy load balancer: An SSL proxy load balancer terminates SSL connections at the load balancer and forwards the traffic to the backends over HTTP. This type of load balancer is ideal when you do not have access to SSL certificates and want to enable SSL termination on the load balancer. However, it is not designed to handle slow network protocols such as SMTP and IMAP.
B. Network load balancer: A network load balancer forwards traffic directly to the backend instances based on IP protocol data. This type of load balancer is optimized for low latency and high throughput, making it ideal for handling network protocols such as SMTP and IMAP. However, it does not provide SSL termination.
C. HTTPS load balancer: An HTTPS load balancer is designed to handle HTTPS traffic and provides SSL termination at the load balancer. It also supports HTTP/2 and QUIC protocols and can route traffic based on URL rules. However, it is not optimized for slow network protocols such as SMTP and IMAP.
D. TCP proxy load balancer: A TCP proxy load balancer provides Layer 4 load balancing for TCP traffic and can perform SSL termination at the load balancer. It is ideal for handling slow network protocols such as SMTP and IMAP as it can optimize the TCP connection between clients and backends. However, it does not support HTTP/2 or QUIC protocols.
Based on the above analysis, the most appropriate load balancer for the scenario described would be the TCP proxy load balancer. It can handle slow network protocols such as SMTP and IMAP and provide SSL termination at the load balancer. Additionally, it can optimize the TCP connection between clients and backends, providing better performance for the slow network protocols.
