Your company is working with a partner to provide a solution for a customer.
Both your company and the partner organization are using GCP.
There are applications in the partner's network that need access to some resources in your company's VPC.
There is no CIDR overlap between the VPCs.
Which two solutions can you implement to achieve the desired results without compromising the security? (Choose two.)
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D. E.CD.
https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/vpcSure, I can explain the two solutions that can be implemented to achieve the desired results without compromising security:
In this case, VPC peering can be set up between your company's VPC and the partner's VPC to allow access to resources in your company's VPC. The traffic between the two VPCs will remain private and secure, and there will be no need for a gateway or a VPN. However, it's essential to note that VPC peering does not allow transitive peering, meaning if there are multiple VPCs that need to communicate with each other, each VPC must establish a peering connection with every other VPC.
In this case, a shared VPC can be set up between your company's VPC and the partner's VPC, allowing applications in the partner's network to access resources in your company's VPC securely. This solution is useful when both parties require a high level of control over their respective resources but need to share resources between them. Additionally, shared VPC allows for central management of network resources, making it easier to implement policies and maintain network security.
In summary, VPC peering and Shared VPC are two solutions that can be implemented to achieve the desired results without compromising security, depending on the requirements and the level of control each party requires over their resources.