Which of the following BEST demonstrates that the objectives of an information security governance framework are being met?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.D.
The objectives of an information security governance framework can include protecting sensitive information, ensuring regulatory compliance, reducing risk exposure, and optimizing resource utilization. To demonstrate that these objectives are being met, organizations can use several metrics and measurement tools.
Out of the given options, the best option to demonstrate that the objectives of an information security governance framework are being met is Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
KPIs are quantitative measures that indicate how effectively an organization is achieving its strategic and operational goals. KPIs can be used to measure the performance of various security controls, processes, and practices.
For example, an organization might use KPIs to measure the percentage of security incidents that are detected and resolved within a specified time frame. They could also use KPIs to measure the effectiveness of training and awareness programs, the percentage of systems that are regularly patched and updated, or the number of vulnerabilities identified and remediated.
KPIs are an effective tool for demonstrating that the objectives of an information security governance framework are being met because they provide clear, objective, and measurable indicators of performance. By tracking KPIs over time, organizations can identify trends, measure progress, and make data-driven decisions to improve their security posture.
The other options, such as risk dashboard, penetration test results, and balanced scorecard, can also provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of an information security governance framework. However, KPIs are the best option as they provide a direct indication of whether the objectives are being met.
A risk dashboard can provide a high-level overview of an organization's risk posture, but it may not provide specific indicators of whether the security governance framework is meeting its objectives. Similarly, penetration test results can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of specific security controls or processes, but they may not provide a holistic view of whether the security governance framework is meeting its objectives. Lastly, a balanced scorecard is a management tool that provides a broad view of organizational performance, but it may not specifically address the objectives of an information security governance framework.