Two instructors are team teaching.
The first instructor receives an excellent evaluation and the second instructor receives a lower evaluation.
Which of the following methods would work BEST to make the second instructor more effective?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.B.
Of the options provided, the best method to help the second instructor become more effective is B, having the first instructor provide feedback to the second instructor's teaching techniques.
The reasoning behind this is that the first instructor has received an excellent evaluation and is therefore likely doing something right in their teaching. By having them provide feedback to the second instructor, they can share their best practices and offer constructive criticism that the second instructor can use to improve their own teaching.
Option A, having the second instructor perform a self-evaluation, can be useful but may not provide the specific feedback necessary to address the areas where the second instructor needs improvement.
Option C, reporting the evaluation to a supervisor and having the instructor replaced, is not a constructive solution and should only be used as a last resort if the instructor is consistently performing poorly and unable to improve.
Option D, having the class re-evaluate the second instructor using an alternate method, could be helpful but may not address the specific issues identified in the original evaluation. Additionally, it may be difficult to ensure that all students are providing accurate and constructive feedback.
In summary, the best course of action to make the second instructor more effective would be to have the first instructor provide feedback to help them improve their teaching techniques.