When can a process be rated as 'Largely achieved' for a particular attribute of that process?

C.

According to the "A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT" (also known as COBIT 5), a process can be rated as "Largely achieved" for a particular attribute of that process based on the following criteria:

B. There are no significant weaknesses related to the attribute of that process.

This means that the process has no significant weaknesses in the attribute being evaluated, and it is expected that the attribute is being consistently achieved.

However, it is important to note that the other answer options are not completely incorrect:

A. There is some evidence of some achievement of the attribute for that process.

This option suggests that there is some evidence of achievement for the attribute being evaluated, but it does not necessarily mean that the achievement is significant or consistent.

C. There is evidence of a systematic approach to the attribute of that process.

This option suggests that there is evidence of a systematic approach to the attribute being evaluated, but it does not necessarily mean that the attribute is being consistently achieved.

D. When all the process attributes of the five capability levels rate an average score of process capability Level 2.

This option is not necessarily applicable since it evaluates the process as a whole rather than a particular attribute of that process. COBIT 5 does provide a process capability model that evaluates the process as a whole based on five capability levels, but it is not directly related to rating a particular attribute of that process.

In summary, a process can be rated as "Largely achieved" for a particular attribute of that process when there are no significant weaknesses related to the attribute being evaluated.