The running user doesn't override the sharing role while allowing users to see high-level sales data for everyone, not just.
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B.B.
The statement in the question is a bit unclear and seems to be incomplete, but I will try my best to provide an explanation.
In Salesforce, sharing rules are used to extend record access to users who don't have the necessary record-level access to view or edit records. Sharing rules can be based on criteria or manual sharing, and they can be used to grant access to a particular group of users or public group.
The running user is the user who performs an action on behalf of another user or a system. For example, when a user runs a report that includes records they don't have access to, the report results are filtered based on the running user's access.
Now, coming to the statement in the question, it says that the running user doesn't override the sharing role while allowing users to see high-level sales data for everyone, not just [something missing here]. Without knowing the missing information, it's hard to provide a definitive answer. However, I will try to explain based on assumptions.
Assuming that the missing information is "just for themselves," the statement implies that the running user is trying to share high-level sales data with other users, but they also want to see the data themselves. In this scenario, if the running user doesn't have access to the high-level sales data, they won't be able to override the sharing role to grant access to other users.
In other words, the running user's access determines the level of access that can be granted to other users. If the running user doesn't have access to a particular record, they won't be able to share it with other users, even if they have the necessary sharing permissions.
To summarize, if the missing information in the statement is "just for themselves," then the statement is true. However, if the missing information is something else, the answer may be different.