Assessment of Feasibility for Meeting Power Platform Requirements

Correct Answers: A, C and D

When Solution Architects collect and review the requirements, they should always consider the feasibility of meeting the requirement.

It could include the feasibility of the requirement for a new or current feature.

It would be best to verify that users use the feature or that the feature is required and will be used.

Or you need to verify that implementation of some requirements would not violate rules, regulations, or laws.

If the requirements are in violation, you must remove them from the project scope.

Also, it is very important to assess the technology limitations or performance expectations.

The performance requirements must be based on the target infrastructure or software defined for the project to run.

If the expectations for the performance are above the defined technology capabilities, you need to communicate with a customer and change or remove the requirement.

Option B is incorrect because the proof of concept is essential for the pre-sales stage and initial design stage, but it is not part of the requirements.

It can be used to prove or test the feasibility of the requirements.

Option E is incorrect because the naming convention for the project is an important tool for smooth solution implementation and maintenance.

But the convention is not a typical project requirement that needs to be assessed on feasibility.

For more information about the assessment of the feasibility of the requirements, please visit the below URL:

As a Solution Architect for the Power Platform project, your task is to review the requirements and assess the feasibility of meeting them. The assessment should consider the following items:

A. Feature Usability: The usability of the features required by the project should be assessed. You need to determine whether the Power Platform features can be used effectively to meet the requirements of the project. It is important to ensure that the features are user-friendly and meet the business needs of the organization.

B. Proof of Concept: Before implementing the solution, it is important to test it in a controlled environment. A proof of concept can help determine if the solution is feasible and if it meets the requirements of the organization. This testing can help identify potential issues and provide an opportunity to address them before the solution is implemented.

C. Regulatory Rules: In certain industries, there are specific regulatory rules and standards that must be followed. It is important to ensure that the solution meets these rules and standards, such as data privacy regulations and security requirements.

D. Performance Expectations: The performance of the Power Platform solution should be assessed to ensure it meets the expectations of the organization. This includes assessing factors such as response time, scalability, and availability.

E. Naming Convention: Naming conventions should be established and followed consistently throughout the project to ensure that components are easy to identify and maintain. A clear naming convention can help ensure that components are easily identifiable and that the solution is easy to maintain.

In summary, when assessing the feasibility of meeting the requirements of the Power Platform project, it is important to consider the usability of the features, proof of concept testing, regulatory rules, performance expectations, and naming conventions.