Considerations for Assessing Feasibility of Meeting Requirements

Correct Answers: A, C and D

When Solution Architects collect and review the requirements, they should always consider the feasibility of meeting the requirement.

It could include the feasibility of the requirement for a new or current feature.

It would be best to verify that users use the feature or that the feature is required and will be used.

Or you need to verify that implementation of some requirements would not violate rules, regulations, or laws.

If the requirements are in violation, you must remove them from the project scope.

Also, it is very important to assess the technology limitations or performance expectations.

The performance requirements must be based on the target infrastructure or software defined for the project to run.

If the expectations for the performance are above the defined technology capabilities, you need to communicate with a customer and change or remove the requirement.

Option B is incorrect because the proof of concept is essential for the pre-sales stage and initial design stage, but it is not part of the requirements.

It can be used to prove or test the feasibility of the requirements.

Option E is incorrect because the naming convention for the project is an important tool for smooth solution implementation and maintenance.

But the convention is not a typical project requirement that needs to be assessed on feasibility.

For more information about the assessment of the feasibility of the requirements, please visit the below URL:

As a Power Platform Solution Architect, your role is to ensure that the project requirements are feasible, and to assess the feasibility, you need to consider the following items:

A. Feature usability: This involves reviewing the project requirements to ensure that the features and functionalities proposed are relevant and aligned with the project's overall goals. You need to check if the features are user-friendly, well-documented, and meet the business requirements.

B. Proof of concept: This item involves building a prototype to test the feasibility of the proposed solution. You need to validate that the proposed solution can meet the project requirements and identify any potential issues or roadblocks that may impact the project's success. It's important to collaborate with the project team to create and execute a proof of concept that will test the project's core functionalities.

C. Regulatory rules: You need to assess if the project complies with regulatory rules and standards. Regulatory compliance is critical for many industries, such as finance, healthcare, and government. You need to understand the regulatory environment and requirements of the project to ensure that the solution is compliant.

D. Performance expectations: This item involves reviewing the project requirements to ensure that the solution meets performance expectations. You need to consider factors such as scalability, response time, and availability to ensure that the solution can handle the projected user load and data volumes.

E. Naming convention: A consistent naming convention is essential for the ease of use and maintenance of the solution. You need to review the project requirements and ensure that the proposed solution adheres to the company's naming conventions and standards.

In summary, when assessing the feasibility of meeting project requirements as a Power Platform Solution Architect, you need to consider the usability of the features, proof of concept, regulatory rules, performance expectations, and naming convention.