Prince2 Practitioner Project Management Certification: CEO's Role in the Project

The CEO's Role in the Project

Question

Scenario - Additional Information - He started the company 25 years ago and knows his job very well.

He injured his leg two years ago which has restricted his visits Chief Executive Officer (CEO): to the engineering area.

As CEO he has an overall perspective of the business strategic requirements and the authority to commit resources as required.

She has been with the company for three years, following a successful career with a publicity company.

She has the ability to represent the Marketing Director: needs of the business, particularly as this is a marketing project.

She has the authority to commit the annual business marketing budget, from which the project will be funded, as she sees appropriate.

She will be responsible for monitoring the expected benefits of the calendar, in particular the improvement of the company's image.

He has been responsible for many engineering innovations in the company and is still as keen and energetic as the day he started.

Engineering Manager: VVhilst he will not be part of the project team, his staff will feature in the photos for the promotional calendar.

Central Records: This group of five staff looks after all company records and document control.

They now maintain all project files.

This is the local office supplies company.

It supplies all the stationery and office equipment needs of the company and will supply the stationery for Bright Lights: this project.

Portraits ltd: This is a professional photographic company with a number of excellent photographers and a history of successful work.

This company has been selected to take the photos for the company calendar.

It has yet be decided which of the photographers to use.

Which 2 statements explain why the CEO should be appointed as the Executive for this project?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D. E.

DE.

The CEO should be appointed as the Executive for the project because of two key reasons:

  1. He has the authority to commit resources as required - this means that he has the power to allocate the necessary funds and resources to the project, making sure that it is adequately resourced and has the necessary support to succeed. This is crucial in ensuring that the project is given the resources it needs to meet its objectives.

  2. He has an overall perspective of the business's strategic requirements - as CEO, he has a broad understanding of the company's overall objectives and priorities. This enables him to ensure that the project is aligned with the company's strategic goals and is consistent with the broader business objectives. This is essential in ensuring that the project contributes to the overall success of the company and helps to advance its strategic direction.

While the other options provide useful information about the CEO's background and experience, they do not directly relate to the specific requirements of this project. The fact that the CEO started the company 25 years ago and knows his job very well, for example, are certainly valuable attributes but they do not necessarily qualify him to be the Executive for this project. Likewise, the fact that he restricts his visits to the engineering area is not directly relevant to his ability to lead this project.